Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Prodeo Pada Pengadilan Agama Medan Kelas I A Menerapkan EXPROM II

Authors

  • Dewi Feronika Sitinjak Universitas Budidarma

Keywords:

Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penerimaan Prodeo, EXPROM II

Abstract

Prodeo is a court litigation process for free with state funding through court DIPA (Article 1 paragraph 7). In receiving assistance for the general public, it is very important to know how the case is and so that the recipients of the aid can be right on target, there is no choice. In determining the acceptance of Prodeo Medan Religious Court Class 1 A, still using manual methods or there is no system to determine the receipt of a computerized prodeo. So with that the authors propose a computerized system in determining the acceptance of Predeo at the Medan Class 1 A Religious Court.The method that the author proposes in determining the Prodeo Recipient at the Medan Class 1 A Religious Court is the EXPROM II Method, namely the comparison of deviation or distance between alternative pairs for each criterion. In this method, the relative value of one of the alternatives is defined by two preference indices. So the procedure for admission of prodeo at the Medan Religious Court Class I A produces values that can provide an overview in decision making, in order to get the right results for the acceptance of prodeo

References

M. Bobbi, K. Nasution, A. Karim, and S. Esabella, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Penilaian Kinerja Ketua Program Studi Menerapkan Metode WASPAS dengan Pembobotan ROC,” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 130–136, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i1.1619.

A. Karim, S. Esabella, T. Andriani, and M. Hidayatullah, “Penerapan Metode Multi-Objective Optimization on the Basis of Simple Ratio Analysis ( MOOSRA ) dalam Penentuan Lulusan Mahasiswa Terbaik,” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 162–168, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i1.1630.

N. Oktari, D. P. Utomo, S. Aripin, and A. Karim, “Penerapan Metode Operational Competitiveness Rating Analysis ( OCRA ) Dalam Penerimaan Karyawan Perjanjian Kerja Waktu Tertentu ( PKWT ),” vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 218–226, 2022, doi: 10.47065/josh.v3i3.1471.

A. Karim, S. Esabella, M. Hidayatullah, and T. Andriani, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Aplikasi Bantu Pembelajaran Matematika Menggunakan Metode EDAS,” vol. 4, no. 3, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i3.2494.

M. Bobbi, K. Nasution, S. Suryadi, and A. Karim, “Sistem Pendukung Keputusan Dalam Rekomendasi Kelayakan nasabah Penerima Kredit Menerapkan Metode MOORA dan MOOSRA,” vol. 4, no. 3, pp. 1284–1292, 2022, doi: 10.47065/bits.v4i3.2610.

M. Luh Made Yulyantari, S.Kom., M.Pd. , IGKG Puritan Wijaya ADH, S.Kom., Manajemen Model Pada Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: ANDI (Anggota IKAPI), 2019.

Kusrini M.kom, Konsep dan Aplikasi Sistem Pendukung Keputusan. Yogyakarta: C.V ANDI OFFSET, 2007.

M. K. Yasir Hasan, “Implementasi Metode Analytical Hierarchy Process Dalam Menentukan Kelayanakan Guru Penerima Umrah,” vol. 3, 2018.

Domiri, “ANALISIS TENTANG SISTEM PERADILAN AGAMA DI INDONESIA,” vol. 46, 2016.

K. D. Maisari, D. Andreswwari, and R. Efendi, “IMPLEMENTASI METODE TOPSIS DENGAN PEEMBOBOTAN ENTROPY UNTUK PENENTUAN CALON PENERIMA BANTUAN SISWA MISKIN (BSM) APBD KOTA BENGKULU (Studi Kasus: SMAN 8 Kota Bengkulu),” J. Rekursif, vol. 5 No.2 Jul, no. 2303–0755, p. 16, 2017.

S. Yohanna Silalahi, Mesran, Taronisokhi Zebua, “PENERAPAN THE EXTENDED PROMETHEE II (EXPROM II) UNTUK PENETUAN PRODUK DISKON,” vol. 1, 2017.

Munawar, Pemodelan Visual dengan UML. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu, 2005.

R. T.Djaelangkara, “Perancangan Sistem Informasi Akademik Sekolah Berbasis Web Studi Kasus Sekolah Menengah Atas Kristen 1 Tomohon,” e-jurnal Tek. Elektro dan Komput., no. 2301–8402, 2015.

A. S. Rosa and M.Shalahuddin, Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak Terstruktur dan Berorientasi Objek. Bandung: Penerbit Informatika Bandung, 2014.

A. Kadir, Dasar Perancangan dan Implementasi. Yogyakarta: Andi, 2008.

S. Adi, Ice Breaker Permainan Atraktif-Edukatif. Yogyakarta: Andi offset, 2010.

Downloads

Published

2023-05-26

Issue

Section

Articles